Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting — Industry Benchmarks

When you read the 6.1% net profit margin for Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, the number only becomes actionable when paired with scale. This industry sits inside the broader Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting sector and reports $16.1B of aggregate annual receipts across 156,672 federal tax returns. Owners comparing their own books should read the margin as a midpoint — smaller operators typically run several points below the aggregate because fixed overhead (rent, software, insurance) consumes a larger share of lower revenue bases, while the typical establishment here generates $102.9M per year. Treat the industry figure as a ceiling calibrated by businesses that have already achieved operating leverage.

Labor economics tell the second half of the story. Census CBP shows 11,886 active establishments employing 107,090 workers, averaging 9.0 employees per location and paying $54,856/yr per employee annually. California leads the geographic distribution of employment, with Washington and Oregon rounding out the top three concentrations. Headcount density matters because thin-margin industries only clear the cash-flow bar when establishments reach the staffing level where fixed costs amortize — a useful cross-check against the margin line above.

Capital access is the third lens. SBA 7(a) and 504 approvals for this industry totaled 797 loans worth $363 million between FY2020 and FY2025, supporting 6,888 jobs at origination. The average ticket size — $455K — signals the typical capital gap operators bridge when expanding. The Huntington National Bank ranks as the most active SBA lender serving this NAICS code. Use this alongside the IRS and Census figures to decide whether your own plan should target operational efficiency, workforce expansion, or financed growth.